By Ryan Richardson · Published 8 October 2026
Could a different landing page pattern drive a 3-5x lift in call-to-action clicks over the standard multi-section page, and separately, is the offer price-sensitive enough that $19 or $47 outperforms the standard $27 on conversion?
| Test | Ads | Spend/day budget | Impressions | CTR | Landing page views | Purchases |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 landing patterns, $15/day each | 24 | A$178.04 total | 26,275 | 8.16% | 1,443 | 0 |
| 3 price points, $10/day each | 23 | A$71.88 total | 9,875 | 8.80% | 516 | 0 |
Neither sub-test produced a single tracked purchase, so neither can declare a winning pattern or price on sales. On CTR, both sub-tests cleared 8%+, among the stronger click-through rates in this whole dataset, meaning the ad creative pointed at both tests was getting attention regardless of which landing page or price it led to. The hypothesis that a pattern change could drive 3-5x lift was not tested to a conclusion here, because conversion, the metric the hypothesis was about, never produced a usable number.
No documented pattern or price decision from these specific tests was found in the pulled sources; a separate, larger anti-positioning angle test ran on the same offer afterward (see the related clarity-anti-positioning page).
Running 6+ landing-page variants at once at $15/day each spreads a small budget thin; at these spend levels (A$178.04 and A$71.88 total) the test can only answer a CTR question, not a conversion question, so set expectations before launch about which question the budget can actually answer.
| Claim | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 6 landing patterns test: ads/spend/impressions/CTR/LPV/purchases | 24 / A$178.04 / 26,275 / 8.16% / 1,443 / 0 | Sixty Steps ad account, Meta Ads data |
| 3 price points test: ads/spend/impressions/CTR/LPV/purchases | 23 / A$71.88 / 9,875 / 8.80% / 516 / 0 | Sixty Steps ad account, Meta Ads data |
| Landing patterns tested: control multi-section, quiz, long-form, call-first, reddit-style, founder-letter, each $15/day | confirmed | Sixty Steps ad account, Meta Ads data |
| Price points tested: $19, $27, $47, each $10/day | confirmed | Sixty Steps ad account, Meta Ads data |
| Combined spend across both tests | A$249.92 (A$178.04 + A$71.88) | Sixty Steps ad account, Meta Ads data |
| Hypothesis was a 3-5x CTA lift vs control | confirmed | Sixty Steps ad account, Meta Ads data |