sixtysteps.co

Short ad copy slightly beat medium-length copy on CTR

By Ryan Richardson · Published 8 October 2026

In the same cold-traffic ad matrix, short ad copy drew 8.39% click-through rate against 8.04% for medium-length copy, a small gap on a combined 30,455 impressions. Neither length produced a recorded purchase.

What was compared

Copy length was one of 4 dimensions (hook, angle, identity, length) tagged on ads in a single cold-traffic test matrix. Short and medium are the two length tags with enough spend and impressions to read.

Results

A 'long' copy length tag had under A$20 spend and is too thin to include.

LengthAdsSpendImpressionsCTRLanding page viewsPurchases
Short81A$110.0119,1438.39%8020
Medium40A$68.7811,3128.04%5510

How sure to be about this

The CTR gap between short and medium is small (0.35 points) against a combined 121 ads, so this is closer to a tie than a clear winner. Both lengths drew roughly the same click-through-to-landing-page-view ratio and zero purchases, so the honest read is that copy length wasn't the thing holding sales back for this cold audience.

The numbers
ClaimValueSource
Short copy spend/ads/impressions/CTR/LPV/purchasesA$110.01 / 81 / 19,143 / 8.39% / 802 / 0Sixty Steps ad account, Meta Ads data
Medium copy spend/ads/impressions/CTR/LPV/purchasesA$68.78 / 40 / 11,312 / 8.04% / 551 / 0Sixty Steps ad account, Meta Ads data
Combined impressions and ad count, short + medium copy30,455 impressions / 121 adsSixty Steps ad account, Meta Ads data
CTR gap, short vs medium copy0.35 percentage points (8.39% - 8.04%)Sixty Steps ad account, Meta Ads data
Go deeper

This page covers one step. The full method is in the book.

Read the full part
sixtysteps.co
AI-powered growth for what's next. Sixty Steps is Onwards Analytics — a data and analytics firm.
Pages
Home Library The book — $7 About
Start
The Teardown — free [email protected]
© 2026 Onwards Analytics Every claim on this site carries a number, or is marked as reasoning.