sixtysteps.co

Filling every cell of your awareness grid is its own failure mode

By Ryan Richardson · Published 8 October 2026

A buyer-awareness grid, crossing five awareness stages against your buyer types, breaks in two different directions: filling every cell for the sake of completeness, which produces a pile of mediocre angles instead of a few sharp ones, and stage collision, pitching two different awareness stages in one asset, which produces a good click-through rate paired with a poor result on the page behind it.

The symptom, version one

A business has dutifully filled every cell of its awareness-by-buyer-type grid, and the resulting creative all feels interchangeable and forgettable, none of it especially sharp.

The symptom, version two

An advertisement pulls a decent click-through rate, and the page behind it converts poorly anyway, with nothing obviously wrong on either side when checked in isolation.

The cause

The first failure comes from treating the grid as a checklist to complete rather than a tool for finding the sharpest few gaps. Covering every cell equally dilutes effort across angles that don't all deserve equal weight. The second, more diagnosable failure is stage collision: an advertisement written to one awareness stage, and the page behind it written to a different one. Reading the two headlines side by side, before touching audience, budget, or bids, catches this quickly: if the ad's opening line and the page's opening line are answering different questions, that's the mismatch producing the gap between clicks and conversions.

The fix

Use the grid to find the blank cell worth writing to, not to defend filling in the whole theory. Assign exactly one awareness stage to each individual asset, decided before drafting starts; an advertisement gets one scroll and one stage, while a page can walk a reader down several stages because they'll keep scrolling if the earlier sections earned it. Before touching anything else, read the ad's opening line and the page's opening line side by side and confirm they're addressing the same stage.

How to spot it

If your creative output feels uniformly average rather than sharp in a few places, check whether the grid was filled for completeness rather than used to find genuine gaps. If an ad's click-through rate looks fine and the page's conversion rate doesn't, read the two opening lines side by side before changing audience or budget.

The numbers
ClaimValueSource
What filling every cell for completeness producestwenty-five mediocre angles instead of a few sharp onesMeasured in Real Money, Field Manual
What stage collision looks like and the fast check for ita decent click-through rate paired with a poor page result, caught by reading two headlines side by side before touching audience, budget or bidsMeasured in Real Money, Field Manual
Go deeper

This page covers one step. The full method is in the book.

Read the full part
sixtysteps.co
AI-powered growth for what's next. Sixty Steps is Onwards Analytics — a data and analytics firm.
Pages
Home Library The book — $7 About
Start
The Teardown — free [email protected]
© 2026 Onwards Analytics Every claim on this site carries a number, or is marked as reasoning.