sixtysteps.co

A script found in a second what a careful reader missed once

By Ryan Richardson · Published 8 October 2026

Run six mechanical checks on the reading copy before any human reader sees it, each one failing the build rather than warning and letting it through. One blind reader caught a single leaked internal citation tag by hand; a script searching the same text found 53 of them across 24 lines in under a second.

The six gates and their thresholds

Leak check: any internal tag or process word in the reader's copy, threshold zero. The lint: any em dash, plus a fixed list of machine-sounding and filler words, threshold zero em dashes and at most six per thousand words. Tell scan: sentence openers a machine favours, at most 0.08 per thousand words. Density: mean sentence length around 15 words, no paragraph over 120 words. Overlap: nine-word runs shared with the author's own earlier work, threshold zero. Trace check: every personal sentence tagged, every cited fact id real, threshold zero bad ids.

None of these six thresholds was picked after the fact. The tell-scan line was drawn by measuring real writers first: a well-known clean human writer measured 0.000 per thousand, a well-known business author measured 0.075, and prose a language model had revised measured 0.464, nearly six times over the 0.08 target.

What a script catches that a careful reader misses

A search over one reading copy found 53 leaked internal tags across 24 lines: 46 fact-citation brackets, 5 interview-round tags, and 3 stray process words. One of them had been sitting inside a quote, dressed up as part of the sentence being quoted, which is exactly why it read as plausible on a first pass and wrong on a second.

The overlap gate's first run on one manuscript failed outright, finding 11 shared nine-word runs with an earlier book, the longest 20 words. Every one was the same true story told in near-identical words across both books. All 11 were reworded, and the re-run came back at zero.

Trust a gate only after you've broken it

Plant the exact defect a gate claims to catch, and confirm the gate fails: a fake citation bracket slipped inside a quote for the leak check, one em dash anywhere for the lint, one paragraph opened with a known machine phrase for the tell scan, one deliberately long sentence for density, nine words lifted from your own earlier work for overlap, one untagged personal sentence for the trace check. A gate that stays green on a planted defect isn't a gate yet. Never give any of these six an override flag, because an override gets used once, at eleven at night, under deadline pressure, which is exactly when the gate is worth the most.

The numbers
ClaimValueSource
Leaked internal tags found by the leak check in one run53, across 24 linesThe Sixty Steps manuscript
Shared nine-word runs found on the overlap gate's first run11, longest 20 wordsThe Sixty Steps manuscript
Tell-scan rates measured across real and AI-revised writershuman writers 0.000-0.075 per thousand words; AI-revised prose 0.464; target 0.08The Sixty Steps manuscript
Matrix difficulty/coverage for this stepEasy / Almost nobody does thisThe Sixty Steps matrix
Density gate paragraph ceilingno paragraph over 120 wordsThe Sixty Steps manuscript
Go deeper

This page covers one step. The full method is in the book.

Read the full part
sixtysteps.co
AI-powered growth for what's next. Sixty Steps is Onwards Analytics — a data and analytics firm.
Pages
Home Library The book — $7 About
Start
The Teardown — free [email protected]
© 2026 Onwards Analytics Every claim on this site carries a number, or is marked as reasoning.